I, Frankenstein monster tells the story of Dr. Frankenstein (played by Aaron Eckhart), which reaches 200 years after its revival in the world today. Long before its existence was already a long war between the "Gargoyles" (gargoyles) and demons. Gargoyles fight disguised as angels, God's orders and archangels to protect all people and their souls. The war demons contrast, wages in the heavenly forms in order to leave the hell consumed worldwide. Frankenstein's monster, which moves under the name Adam, fighting for his life if it appears that both parties have great interest in it.
Collected together
The concept of the sample of Dr. Frankenstein is known: this crazy but brilliant scientist has robbed graves and loose body parts sewn together to create a single human entity. Unfortunately, this film is a translation of Title I, Frankenstein too literal. Because like the monster this movie is unconnected parts. The shares are attractive enough that boredom will darken temporarily, but then stops. The dialogues are just monitoring, and logic of the characters is so irregular that no basis for the commandments of the viewer. Adam (Aaron Eckhart) is a flat, dull figure that evokes mainly irritation. Combined with Recite predictable and uninteresting scenes, the story is completely internal. Furthermore, the narrative both at the beginning of the film and greatly cliché end.
comic elements
Director Stuart Beattie, the Underworld sphere success in vain tried to imitate. The gift of comic elements as we know from his previous work as well as rigid architecture of the action scenes are missing here. Fortunately, the action scenes make this movie is not a waste of time, with spectacular fighting slow motion and colorful special effects in the dark world they are. Currently the flop this movie is not complete.
conclusion
Aaron Eckhart plays a boring character and the script is predictable from start to finish. The reliable design of the Underworld series can not save this bad movie. Heaven vs Hell-lovers can spawn better (1997) and Constantine (2005) remain. Because this film Stuart Beattie is very basic in structure, full of totally inimitable logical and predictable plot twists. In addition to the spectacular action scenes has little to offer to this film.
